​Supreme Court won’t hear AI-generated art copyright case 

​Supreme Court won’t hear AI-generated art copyright case 

Photo illustration of the Supreme Court building with pixelated sky.

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can obtain a copyright, as reported earlier by Reuters. The Monday decision comes after Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, appealed a court’s decision to uphold a ruling that found AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted.

In 2019, the US Copyright Office rejected Thaler’s request to copyright an image, called A Recent Entrance to Paradise, on behalf of an algorithm he created. The Copyright Office reviewed the decision in 2022 and determined that the image doesn’t include “human authorship,” disqualifying it from copyright protection.

After Thale …

Read the full story at The Verge.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

​You could be an influencer without even realizing it 

​You could be an influencer without even realizing it 

​ A similar AI shopping feature on TikTok. | The Verge In late February, Puck…

​Mastodon now has a button for sharing content from other websites 

​Mastodon now has a button for sharing content from other…

​ Sharing content to Mastodon is getting easier with the addition of a universal “Share…

​Apple might use Google servers to store data for its upgraded AI Siri 

​Apple might use Google servers to store data for its…

​ Apple has asked Google to look into “setting up servers” for a new version…