​Supreme Court won’t hear AI-generated art copyright case 

​Supreme Court won’t hear AI-generated art copyright case 

Photo illustration of the Supreme Court building with pixelated sky.

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can obtain a copyright, as reported earlier by Reuters. The Monday decision comes after Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, appealed a court’s decision to uphold a ruling that found AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted.

In 2019, the US Copyright Office rejected Thaler’s request to copyright an image, called A Recent Entrance to Paradise, on behalf of an algorithm he created. The Copyright Office reviewed the decision in 2022 and determined that the image doesn’t include “human authorship,” disqualifying it from copyright protection.

After Thale …

Read the full story at The Verge.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

​Apple’s cheapest AirPods have hit $89 

​Apple’s cheapest AirPods have hit $89 

​ The AirPods 4 are the best entry-level AirPods yet. | Photo by Chris Welch…

​How the new iPhone 17E stacks up against Apple’s pricier phones 

​How the new iPhone 17E stacks up against Apple’s pricier…

​ Unlike its predecessor, the iPhone 17E supports MagSafe. | Image: Apple The iPhone 17…

​You could be an influencer without even realizing it 

​You could be an influencer without even realizing it 

​ A similar AI shopping feature on TikTok. | The Verge In late February, Puck…